Answered by:
Does SQL Server support 'true' Active/Active Clustering?

Question
-
Does SQL Server support 'true' Active/Active Clustering?
I believe that SQL Server JUST supports a Failover Clustering where only one node is active at a certain point of time and next node takes up the work post a failover happens automatically/manually triggered.
I got confused today when somebody referred Active/Active Clustering for SQL Server as what I understand from Active/Active is that all nodes that are a part of the cluster are active and accessing the same set of database files...like we have in Oracle RAC.
Saturday, April 28, 2012 12:54 AM
Answers
-
No, SQL Server does not support load balanced clustering as in Oracle RAC or VMS clustering. It is failover clustering only...
Some people use the term active/active to indicate they have an instance of SQL Server running on both nodes. That is, 2 separate SQL Server instances with separate storage and databases. I term this a multi-instance cluster because each instance could be running on either node at any given time. It could be active/passive (both active on node 1, node 2 idle), active/active (one instance active on each node) or passive/active (both active on node 2, node 1 idle).
The problem with that terminology is that it really isn't clear which node is hosting which instance.
Jeff Williams
- Marked as answer by dblover Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:44 PM
Saturday, April 28, 2012 1:45 AM
All replies
-
No, SQL Server does not support load balanced clustering as in Oracle RAC or VMS clustering. It is failover clustering only...
Some people use the term active/active to indicate they have an instance of SQL Server running on both nodes. That is, 2 separate SQL Server instances with separate storage and databases. I term this a multi-instance cluster because each instance could be running on either node at any given time. It could be active/passive (both active on node 1, node 2 idle), active/active (one instance active on each node) or passive/active (both active on node 2, node 1 idle).
The problem with that terminology is that it really isn't clear which node is hosting which instance.
Jeff Williams
- Marked as answer by dblover Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:44 PM
Saturday, April 28, 2012 1:45 AM -
An well discussion on the acticve/active and active/passive in SQL server 2005/2008 you can find in the below thread-
Rama Udaya.K ramaudaya.blogspot.com ---------------------------------------- Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
Saturday, April 28, 2012 6:40 AM -
Thanks for the reply!
I had the same understanding...
Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:45 PM -
-
As it been answered, I'll second that motion. No, unfortunately SQL Server does not have an 'Oracle RAC' configuration. I'd like to see this in a future release as Oracle has been doing it for years. For many of us who manage both Oracle and SQL Server databases; this has always been a missing feature of SQL Server.
Roz
Monday, April 30, 2012 7:28 PM