none
EAS 14.0 Reply state example RRS feed

  • Question

  • Hi,

       Can someone please provide details on how to sync the reply state with example packages?

       Or hints so that i can find some relation in the specification?

    Thanks

    Czar

    Tuesday, January 18, 2011 12:13 PM

Answers

  • Hi Dominic,

                  Is my understanding correct it seems to me that the relation of "reply state" in specification is with 2.2.2.23 email2:LastVerbExecuted (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee201536%28EXCHG.80%29.aspx).

                  The term "reply state" is being promoted in the EAS 14.0 product specification was confusing as similar term was not being located in the specification.

     

    Thanks

    Sireesh


    • Marked as answer by King Salemno Wednesday, January 26, 2011 7:33 PM
    Thursday, January 20, 2011 6:53 AM
  • Sireesh,

    This is indeed the Reply State in which you seek. I have filed a bug against the documentation for clarity.

    Thank you for your feedback.

    Dominic Salemno
    Escalation Engineer
    Open Specifications

    • Marked as answer by King Salemno Wednesday, January 26, 2011 7:33 PM
    Wednesday, January 26, 2011 7:30 PM

All replies

  • Hi Czar,

    Thank you for your question.  A colleague will contact you soon to follow up.

    Regards,

    Mark Miller

    Escalation Engineer

    US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM

     

    Tuesday, January 18, 2011 1:25 PM
  • Czar,

    I am the engineer who has taken ownership of your issue. I am currently investigating this and will update you as things progress.

    Dominic Salemno
    Escalation Engineer
    Open Specifications

    Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:15 PM
  • Hi Dominic,

                  Is my understanding correct it seems to me that the relation of "reply state" in specification is with 2.2.2.23 email2:LastVerbExecuted (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee201536%28EXCHG.80%29.aspx).

                  The term "reply state" is being promoted in the EAS 14.0 product specification was confusing as similar term was not being located in the specification.

     

    Thanks

    Sireesh


    • Marked as answer by King Salemno Wednesday, January 26, 2011 7:33 PM
    Thursday, January 20, 2011 6:53 AM
  • Sireesh,

    This is indeed the Reply State in which you seek. I have filed a bug against the documentation for clarity.

    Thank you for your feedback.

    Dominic Salemno
    Escalation Engineer
    Open Specifications

    • Marked as answer by King Salemno Wednesday, January 26, 2011 7:33 PM
    Wednesday, January 26, 2011 7:30 PM