none
Rx, retlang and CCR, which is faster for real time messaging? RRS feed

  • Question

  • Rx, retlang and CCR, which is faster for real time messaging or internal messaging?

    明知沒有可能但仍然不願死心


    Thursday, September 26, 2013 1:58 AM

Answers

  • I think it will depend heavily on the kind of traffic that you are generating. If performance is critical, you ultimately may need to conduct some experiments with simulated workloads and measure performance.

    I'm not sure what you mean by "real-time messaging", but you will never get real-time anything on a PC.  If you need real-time messaging, you need a real-time OS like VxWorks.

    CCR has the added built-in ability to remote messages across process and across machines.  If by "internal messaging" you mean in-process, you may find that CCR is more complex than you need.

    -G

    Friday, September 27, 2013 7:27 PM

All replies

  • I think it will depend heavily on the kind of traffic that you are generating. If performance is critical, you ultimately may need to conduct some experiments with simulated workloads and measure performance.

    I'm not sure what you mean by "real-time messaging", but you will never get real-time anything on a PC.  If you need real-time messaging, you need a real-time OS like VxWorks.

    CCR has the added built-in ability to remote messages across process and across machines.  If by "internal messaging" you mean in-process, you may find that CCR is more complex than you need.

    -G

    Friday, September 27, 2013 7:27 PM
  • Gershon,

    With the utmost respect, are you certain CCR can "remote messages across process and across machines"?  Don't you actually mean DSS?

    I am open to enlightenment :-)


    Dennis M. Knippel

    Tuesday, April 8, 2014 3:39 PM
    Moderator
  • You are correct.  Messaging between remote services is what I meant.
    Wednesday, April 9, 2014 11:27 PM