locked
Auto Failover Issues RRS feed

  • Question

  • I have been looking over the forum, and also other sites for information about my problem but cant seem to find what im looking for so I have decided to make a quick post.

     

    Presently, I have 3 computers setup for mirroring. One is the principal, another the mirror and the third is the witness.

     

    Im using SQL 2005 Enterprise Edition on all three, and creation of the mirror using SQL Studio works without problems. Manual failover (using the button in SQL Studio) also works fine.

     

    When I start the "Mirror Monitor" application, and connect to the two DB servers the status is all green, they are connected to each other and the witness server can be contacted.

     

    Now here is my issue; when its time for an automatic failover situation (pulling the plug from the current principal for example) it detects the fault and changes the status of the mirror to "principal" BUT keeps the other status to "Disconnected" (Principal, Disconnected) so no active connections to the failed over database will work.

     

    When running the mirror monitor during the failed fail-over attempt the still online database reports that the connection to the witness is still present but the mirror is offline.

     

    There are a few error notices in the logs, but from what I can tell they are normal for whats happening. But the codes would be 1479 (cant talk to the database; this would be the one we took offline) and 1474 (network name is no longer available; once again as it was taken offline). Note that these errors are also in the witness server logs, as I believe one should expect.

     

    Any help or assistance with this problem would be appreciated.

     

    Thanks,

     

    Sean

    Tuesday, May 22, 2007 6:28 PM

All replies

  • Do you see any network related issues or warnings between the principal and mirror servers?
    Monday, May 28, 2007 7:19 PM
  • Hate to state the obvious, but you don't mention that you re-connect server 1 in your scenario. What you are describing is exactly what I would expect to happen.
    Friday, June 1, 2007 3:48 AM