Answered by:
Which Rx1.x version should I use?

Question
-
I have serveral XP clients with 3.5sp1 (customers)
Should I use the experimental version? or better the stable?
Some nice day I will use Rx2...
txs flori
flori
Tuesday, August 28, 2012 2:23 PM
Answers
-
I have used 1.0.10621.0 (NuGet: Rx-Main v1.0.11226) successfully for a long time i.e. the Stable release of v1. It is also the version that http://www.introtorx.com was written against, so you can be sure to have some relevant guidance to hand.
Lee Campbell http://LeeCampbell.blogspot.com
- Proposed as answer by Bart De Smet [MSFT] Monday, September 3, 2012 12:45 PM
- Marked as answer by Bart De Smet [MSFT] Thursday, September 6, 2012 7:33 PM
Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:06 AM
All replies
-
Hi Flori,
The stable version is supported by MS, while the experimental version isn't.
Also, the stable version will probably provide everything that you need. If you find that it doesn't, then consider using the experimental version. You can upgrade later if necessary.
- Dave
- Proposed as answer by Bart De Smet [MSFT] Monday, September 3, 2012 12:45 PM
Tuesday, August 28, 2012 5:18 PM -
I have used 1.0.10621.0 (NuGet: Rx-Main v1.0.11226) successfully for a long time i.e. the Stable release of v1. It is also the version that http://www.introtorx.com was written against, so you can be sure to have some relevant guidance to hand.
Lee Campbell http://LeeCampbell.blogspot.com
- Proposed as answer by Bart De Smet [MSFT] Monday, September 3, 2012 12:45 PM
- Marked as answer by Bart De Smet [MSFT] Thursday, September 6, 2012 7:33 PM
Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:06 AM -
In fact, we'll publish an Rx v1.0 SP2 build to address the most pressing issues. This will likely be complemented with an experimental build to include the same fixes.
If you don't rely on any experimental functionality, I'd recommend the latest v1.0 stable (or v2.0 as you arrive at the point where you can upgrade). If you have a dependency on experimental functionality, feel free to post it here - most v1.1 experimental stuff has a stable counterpart/alternative.
using (Microsoft.Sql.Cloud.DataProgrammability.Rx) { Signature.Emit("Bart De Smet"); }
- Proposed as answer by Bart De Smet [MSFT] Thursday, September 6, 2012 7:33 PM
Monday, September 3, 2012 12:45 PM