re 1 ) Hm, yes, why couldn't MS have given this info?
a) MS does not want to admit that they could be wrong.
b) MS wants you to keep WDS for some reason, even if you don't like it, and even if they could fairly
easily have fixed problems and make enhancements that would have made WDS useful & userfriendly.
Why, for example, is there no method to find a file by its extension (you know: *.doc, *.xls) that you as enduser
get to define and at the same time also by date.
The simple DOS based utility programs of about 1984 through 1993 had that capability, and then, ever since "Windows Explorer" appeared, finding a file by its extension became "outlawed". Who makes such decisions? Mr Grinch?
And, please don't get me started about permissions! Garrr!!!
(Dear MS, I own my computer. How much do I have to pay you to get permission to use my computer?) Garrr!!
While I am at it: Will anyone ever fix SQL to make it more userfriendly? I won't ever try MICROSOFT DYNAMICS
because it uses SQL, which is a painfully unintuitive and horrible "Structured Query Language". Ever wonder how much
business MS never gets, because it never understands what part of its software is unintuitive, and therefore, for the
home user, of no use ? But I digress.
c) May be there is a hidden reason that there is no MS MVP (Most valuable professional) that is connected to WDS,
and that the WDS helpfile makes no mention about uninstalling.
There is no HELP - ABOUT info anywhere in the program, no product ID, no version ID, no update
ID. There is no info about lead programmers, project managers, etc. It has all the feel of a
skunk works product, or an illegal drive-by killer program. No one wants to be responsible for it.
Speaking of feel: The program acts as if a service like GOOGLE didn't exist. You need ZERO KNOWLEDGE
to use GOOGLE. You need a degree in computer science to may be, just may be, figure out how to
porgram a socalled IFILTER in order to find a file that WINDOWS Desktop Search decided you are not allowed
to find, e.g. a file with an extension not known to the WDS programmer. Never mind that with web technology
MICROSOFT could have automated that process, e.g. if you look for a file with an unknown extension, an automatic
request for an IFILTER for that file goes to MS, and a program that rewrites and revises programs gets going
and sends the finished product to the enduser. That would have been nice, but never mind. It boggles the mind
to think about all the possible things that MS decides are just impossible.
re 2) WDS should not have installed itself.
a) Oh, Dear, you shouldnt' have!
b) If you use the MS Update "Express Install", the "MS recommended" approach, MS update will just install
everything MS thinks you computer should have. Like it or not. This can be good or bad.
Pretty Bad, if bad software gets pushed down the pike in this manner. Bad, if security updates come in
automatically and knock out progams or processes you depend on, with no recourse, etc.
Can also be good, if a security update indeed prevents your computer from catching a really vile virus, trojan, rootkit,
etc. Also, good, if the update really, I mean really, fixes something without destroying something else.
c) You can set up your Windows or MS Update so that it will download files, and inform you about the
update that's available, and then it is up to you to decide which update you want to have actually
installed. This is another gamble, because you don't know for sure whether some program will do what
it says it will do. At least this method gives you the opportunity to look at each update's info on the MS website
and research whether it has a "known issue" or "incompatibility". Sometimes you might find it affects only
users of the "1996 Version of Legoland versus Batman and Godzilla", and then you jump over your shadow
and install it. At other times you find notices about how the update makes the internet disappear, and
Excel might explode and Word withers into a woolly ball and dies. Then you might do well to wait for
a new improved update.
Another thing is that the WDS update did not mention that it would remove or destroy the "old Search
facility that was part of Windows XP", which in itself was slow, clunky, but at least workable. If I uninstall
"WDS" now, will I get the the old one back? Not very likely,
Note: This post contains no code sample. I am using plain English, which is easy to misunderstand.