Open Specifications Developer Center >
Open Specifications Forums
>
Using the Exchange Server Protocols
>
[MS-OXORULE] Action Flavor flags
[MS-OXORULE] Action Flavor flags
- Hi,
MS-OXORULE 2.2.5.1.2 "Action Flavors" shows a table of flags.
Entry "TM" is shown at position 8 in the table. Based on the weird convention used in these specs, that is 0x00008000. However the associated text shows it as bit mask 0x00000008 (which would be position 4).
Which is correct?
Thanks
Brad- Edited byBrad Hards Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:29 PM
Answers
- Hi Brad,
I apologize I was not more clear. The drawing in the table is incorrect. The "TM" flag should be in bit position 4, not bit position 8 as the document currently shows.
Regards,
Mark Miller
Escalation Engineer
US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM- Marked As Answer byMark Miller_DSCMSFT, ModeratorMonday, November 16, 2009 5:58 PM
All Replies
- Hi Brad, thanks for your post regarding the [MS-OXORULE] Action Flavor flags. One of my colleagues will contact you shortly. Thanks!
Regards,
Bill Wesse
Escalation Engineer - Hi Brad,
Just wanted to let you know I'm investigating this.
Regards,
Mark Miller
Escalation Engineer
US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM - Hi Brad,
You are correct. A bug was filed against the documentation for this issue.
Regards,
Mark Miller
Escalation Engineer
US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM - Mark,
I don't understand this response in the context of the question.
I asked:
Entry "TM" is shown at position 8 in the table. Based on the weird convention used in these specs, that is 0x00008000. However the associated text shows it as bit mask 0x00000008 (which would be position 4).
Which is correct?
It is obviously inconsistent, but I'd like to know which bitmask I should use for TM: 0x00008000.or 0x00000008?
Brad
- Hi Brad,
I apologize I was not more clear. The drawing in the table is incorrect. The "TM" flag should be in bit position 4, not bit position 8 as the document currently shows.
Regards,
Mark Miller
Escalation Engineer
US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM- Marked As Answer byMark Miller_DSCMSFT, ModeratorMonday, November 16, 2009 5:58 PM
- Mark,
Thanks for this. Can you advise of the TDI number so we can see this come though into the documentation?
Brad


