Code Contracts
Discuss and provide feedback on Code Contracts.
Filtering and SortingUse these options to narrow down the question and discussion list.
- 6642

Object Reference not set to an instance error on 1.2.20903.10!
onurg Saturday, September 05, 2009 9:05 PM - 1281

Microsoft.CSharp.targets(161,15): error MSB4094
avgil Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:17 AM - 1371

Ambiguous in Namespace
Sean McCownMVPThursday, September 24, 2009 2:29 AM - 4375

Contract.Requires<ArgumentException>(Contract.ForAll(...)); does not throw an ArgumentException, but a "System.Diagnostics.Contracts.__ContractsRuntime+ContractException"
KolomanIVM Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:36 PM - 0216

Conflicting warnings using Implicit Arithmetic Obligations
Alexander Taeschner Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:01 AM - 3485

strong named assemblies seem to have problems with Code Contracts
David K Allen Monday, September 14, 2009 9:25 PM - 5387

Possibly accessing a field on a null reference 'this.$VB$NonLocal__Closure$__1'
Strilanc Saturday, September 05, 2009 11:30 PM - 8538

Structure invariants should take default constructor into account
Strilanc Saturday, September 05, 2009 10:15 PM - 6591

I was using Reflector and it looks like runtime contract checking isn't thread-safe
Strilanc Monday, September 14, 2009 10:56 PM - 1375

End Contract Block
GraDea Friday, September 18, 2009 7:37 AM - 4444

Linq methods require contracts
Strilanc Saturday, September 05, 2009 9:18 PM - 2377

The size of a ReadOnlyCollection<T> initialized from an array cannot be proven
Alexey R. Thursday, September 17, 2009 8:02 AM - 3663

Accessing new fields in ContractClasses is not forbidden and causes FieldAccessException
winSharp93 Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:08 PM - 5610

Why do Contractclasses stay in the assembly?
winSharp93 Wednesday, June 03, 2009 3:38 PM - 1424

Oldstyle Precontition not proveable by assert after preconditions
Alexander Wurzinger Sunday, September 06, 2009 3:16 PM - 1354

Assert witch can't prove condition proven by invariant
Alexander Wurzinger Sunday, September 06, 2009 2:16 PM - 3453

Static verifier fails to prove double is finite
Strilanc Saturday, September 05, 2009 9:00 PM - 2256

Static verifier claims apparently correct method involving division is incorrect
Strilanc Wednesday, September 16, 2009 7:47 AM - 5397

array bounds check was proven but disproven by pex
xor88 Sunday, September 06, 2009 10:39 AM - 7449

Previous versions
cainem Saturday, September 12, 2009 2:25 PM


