BizTalk Server EDI and AS2 ForumAll questions related to new EDI and AS2 features of BizTalk Server.© 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:54:55 Z3fe3223e-45f6-4ee9-a681-2478cdd168cehttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/a64f9acf-e4b5-47f5-afa0-ba2c87d30874http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/a64f9acf-e4b5-47f5-afa0-ba2c87d30874emil chinhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=emil%20chinConfigure HTTP recevie location on different IIS web site outside the default web site?Hi,<br/>Can we configure the HTTP receive location on new IIS web site, which located outside the IIS default web site?<br/><br/>rgds,<br/>EmilThu, 26 Nov 2009 06:38:45 Z2009-11-28T23:54:53Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/a8a18a1a-28ac-4a57-994c-26f9d00b68d8http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/a8a18a1a-28ac-4a57-994c-26f9d00b68d8MikeDoobayhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=MikeDoobayPrerequests for EDI ImplementationHi, I got one implementation as a free lancing. My client need to enhancement for existing application. The present environment is BizTalk 2004, .Net 2003. My client need to Implement EDI 810 Invoice Implementation. What are the prerequisites to implement this? Thanks in Adance. Mike Doobay. Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:49:09 Z2009-11-28T02:31:51Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/05400812-da7d-4a72-a429-57a9f3c750a7http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/05400812-da7d-4a72-a429-57a9f3c750a7cruxkrishhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=cruxkrishModifying EDI Schema X12 214-3050 <p>Hello<br/><br/>We have to add customized segments in standard 214-3050.<br/><br/>Few of them have to appear after N9 segment as ZN9PU, ZN9DEL, ZN9SERV ....<br/><br/>Few of them just need N901 &amp; N902.<br/><br/>Tried to copy N9 segment details and changed the ref to ZN9PU.<br/><br/>When i try to validate the instance getting error Unrecognized data.<br/><br/>And other error that shows ZN9 having first value as U when it finds ZN9PU.<br/><br/>Is there any limitations on character in ref / tag_name?<br/><br/>Here is the instance i am trying to validate in VS2005<br/><br/>ST*214*000000001~<br/>B10*PCT0124553*36264088*CCSL~<br/>B2A*00~<br/>N9*CR*36063362~<br/>N9*PO*S52*BOL~<br/>N9*PO*S5PU3*BOL~<br/>N9*OR*OCT0078308~<br/>N9*BM*36264088~<br/>N9*LO*TCT0059954~<br/>N9*S5*6~<br/>ZN9PU*S5*2~<br/>N1*ZSF*J C INC*91*JCI5536~<br/>N2*FL22343~<br/>N3*2330 LAKE ROAD~<br/>N4*Saint os*MO*62304*US~<br/>G61*SH*Shipper Contact*TE*81612452600*FX*~<br/>N1*ZST*T M LTD*91*JCI1000124095~<br/>N2*FL22344~<br/>N3*1000 A AVENUE~<br/>N4*Txxxxx*xx*A1R 5L8*CA~<br/>N1*ST*T M LTD*91*JCI1000124095~<br/>N2*FL22344~<br/>N3*1000 A AVENUE~<br/>N4*Txxx*XX*A1R 5L8*CA~<br/>N1*CA*D Trans*91*CCSL~<br/>N2*DIRCGY~<br/>N3*Unit 121 xxxxxxxx Ave. S.E.~<br/>N4*Calgary*AB*F2C 5Y2*CA~<br/>G61*CN*Carrier Contact*TE*999960290~<br/>MS2*UNKN*13069*TL~<br/>LX*1~<br/>Q5*X1*091124*1947**NS~<br/>Q6*4272*L*G*108*PCS~<br/>Q6B**SKD**CUBE~<br/>SE*35*000000001~<br/></p>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:23:10 Z2009-11-27T18:13:47Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/e070f634-5ec9-4f36-99db-820fbf49cf91http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/e070f634-5ec9-4f36-99db-820fbf49cf91Dgrospelierhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=DgrospelierEDIFACT : INOVERT & TRADACOM support in BizTalk 2009 or vNext ?<p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="" lang=EN-US><span style="font-size:small"><span style="font-family:Calibri">Does the subset of EDIFACT named &quot;INOVERT&quot; is supported in BizTalk Server 2009 ? Or plan to be in 2009 R2 ?<br/>Same question about the subset &quot;TRADACOM&quot;.<br/>Thanks.<br/><br/>David Grospelier<br/>blog.noveli.fr </span></span></span></p>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:06:22 Z2009-11-27T09:06:23Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/389ea826-a436-45da-b1c8-f01f25dd9c8chttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/389ea826-a436-45da-b1c8-f01f25dd9c8cVidhyaVijayaKumarhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=VidhyaVijayaKumarHow to create Custom EDI Schema in BTS 2006 R2Hello all,<br/><br/>I need to create schema from customized EDI file. <br/><br/>UNB+UNOA:1+sss+zzz+080925:0704+6932'UNH+1+LOGMES:1:0:BM'BGM+997'DTM+243:0809241748:201'NAD+MS+FWRAPPLICATION'NAD+MR+BM*DRIVE'SEQ++000001'LOC+8+PTAZACD'GIN+CN+W0L0XCF2594039564'DLM++Y:DC:Z06:ZGM'DTM+Z05:0809241628:201'GIR+1+0083LPKR:VV'LOC+Z0+PT0999:Z07:ZGM'LOC+Z04+PTAZACD'LOC+Z05+PT0035:Z07:ZGM'SEQ++000002'LOC+8+PTAZACD'GIN+CN+W0L0AHM758G178466'DLM++N:DC:Z06:ZGM'DTM+Z05:0809241638:201'GIR+1+0034LD9T:VV'LOC+Z0+PT0999:Z07:ZGM'LOC+Z04+PTAZACD'LOC+Z05+PT0053:Z07:ZGM'UNT+24+1'UNZ+1+6932'<br/><br/>I tried to treat it as a flatfile and created FF schema out it. but ended up with &quot;<span style="font-size:x-small;color:#ff00ff;font-family:Arial">Unrecognized data in remaining stream.&quot;<br/></span><br/>can anyone guide to create customised EDI schema<br/><br/>Many thanks,<br/>Vidhya<br/><br/><br/><br/>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:00:43 Z2009-11-26T09:44:47Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/cd174f5a-808c-4174-abb6-47d45d59473bhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/cd174f5a-808c-4174-abb6-47d45d59473bMihir1http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Mihir1SegmentID: CTT, SIIHi All, <div><br/></div> <div>I am trying to generate 844 EDI.</div> <div><br/></div> <div>But Everytime I am geting below error.</div> <div>--------------------------------------</div> <div> <div>Error: 1 (Segment level error)</div> <div><span style="white-space:pre"> </span>SegmentID: CTT</div> <div><span style="white-space:pre"> </span>Position in TS: 150</div> <div><span style="white-space:pre"> </span>3: Mandatory Segment Missing</div> <div><br/></div> <div>Error: 2 (Segment level error)</div> <div><span style="white-space:pre"> </span>SegmentID: SII</div> <div><span style="white-space:pre"> </span>Position in TS: 150</div> <div><span style="white-space:pre"> </span>2: Unexpected segment</div> <div>--------------------------------------</div> <div>I have mapped all element of CTT with Some dummy string value(also updated its type to string in schema) and also mapped element 1,2,3,4,5,6 of SII segment with some value.</div> <div><br/></div> <div>Help!!!(F1)</div> <div><br/></div> </div>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:35:34 Z2009-11-25T17:13:19Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/afaed6ba-927c-4b8a-a7ea-1a8ed492f38fhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/afaed6ba-927c-4b8a-a7ea-1a8ed492f38fsrinigaddhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=srinigaddAny Information on Covast Accelerator with BTS 2006?<p>Is there any articles/tutorials on How to confidure Schemas/Send/Receive ports in Covast..any examples....with BTS 2006..I know there are some whitepapers on Covast Site...But apart from that is anywhere else I can get more info on Covast...I had to use EDI with Covast Accelerator and Biztalk 2006</p> <p>Does anybody worked on BizTalk 2006 with Covast EDI Accelerator for EDI Solutions.I could not find any useful articles on BizTalk 2006 with Covast EDI Accelerator. Please let me know if anybdy know or anybody have one ..I appreciate your help..</p>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:46:33 Z2009-11-27T06:42:01Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/9d19937a-08e2-4e56-a067-e21fc172ead0http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/9d19937a-08e2-4e56-a067-e21fc172ead0Marcel Hamannhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Marcel%20HamannEDIFACT Service Schema not foundHi all.<br/> <br/> I try to receive an EDIFACT-Message in my orchestration.<br/> I read data from a file in a receive location. When I put my EDI File into that location I get an error message in the eventlog (translated from german):<br/> <br/> EDIFACT-Serviceschema not found.<br/> <br/> In my iroject I included the EDIFACT_ServiceSchemaExtension.xsd. What else is missing to make it work?<br/> <br/> Thanks for your answers,<br/> <br/> Marcel<br/> <br/>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:18:52 Z2009-11-25T04:09:08Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/50ef652c-3f9d-4f36-8c5a-844ec74031c2http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/50ef652c-3f9d-4f36-8c5a-844ec74031c2Ramprasad Dorairajhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Ramprasad%20DorairajHIPAA 837 Mapping issueHi,<br/>Have any one faced a situation in which, while mapping data to 837P schema, have to group the data at Provider level, so that there will be only one 2000A loop for a given provider. Then at the 2000B loop level if there are different client for the same provider then there will be multiple 2000B loops. If there is new provider available, then once again a 2000A loop will start with its 2000B loops. Had any one faced a similar situation? How was it achieved?<br/><br/>Thanks,<hr class="sig">RamFri, 20 Nov 2009 21:35:03 Z2009-11-24T20:12:50Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/d71b91d5-8b72-489d-941b-61042bb7e6b7http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/d71b91d5-8b72-489d-941b-61042bb7e6b7isabelledchttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=isabelledcCan the test-indicator element be suppressed?<p align=left><font face=Arial size=2>Is it possible to suppress the test-indicator element?</font><font face=Arial size=2> (if it's not a test ofcourse)</font></p> <p align=left>So the UNB looks like this </p> <p align=left>UNB+UNOA:1+AAAAA+BBBBB+080407:1631+16</p> <p align=left>not like this</p> <p align=left>UNB+UNOA:1+AAAAA+BBBBB+080407:1631+16++++0</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>Isabelle</p> <p align=left> </p>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:54:46 Z2009-11-24T10:13:55Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/faa3d839-38b3-449d-8a02-371ea22f2521http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/faa3d839-38b3-449d-8a02-371ea22f2521Bryan Meekhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Bryan%20MeekEDI 834 to FlatFileI am wrestling with a flatfile output behaving badly - to begin it was working fine except the edi transactions, being debatched were creating in the flat file output one record per file (alternately I could tell the send pipeline to append but then the records had no CRLF delimiter).  So, next I went back to my party/receive pipeline and rewired it to keep the EDI batched.  Now, I need to figure out how to use loops in the map to tell it to process all the 2000Loops, each one as a record.  I have looked online/in the Biztalk R2 ProMapper book but there is not an example I can see of looping with a map destination to a flat file.  Would appreciate any help - my head is getting sore and the wall I am banging it on is suffering some too.Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:53:33 Z2009-11-27T06:32:56Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/985d3ea3-2363-4f9f-b0e5-8bd50cd12455http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/985d3ea3-2363-4f9f-b0e5-8bd50cd12455Marcel Hamannhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Marcel%20HamannEDIFACT CONTRL Acknowledgment Error 26 - What happens to the message?Hi all.<br/> <br/> I sent the same message to BizTalk twice and got the EDIFACT CONTRL Acknowledgment Error 26 (duplicate detected) as expected.<br/> But what happens to the message sent? Is it deleted from the system or stored in a database. And if it is stored, in which database?<br/> <br/> I did not build any error handling into my application, so it still uses standard settings for failed messages.<br/> <br/> Any help would be fine,<br/> <br/> Marcel<br/>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:52:51 Z2009-11-26T02:28:48Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/804b2462-a66b-467d-98ce-79fcc547da8dhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/804b2462-a66b-467d-98ce-79fcc547da8dNISHILhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=NISHILAccessing UNA,UNB in Orchestration EDIFACT IFCSUM Schema<p>Hi<br/>Can you let me know how can I access the UNA_segment and UNB_segment inside an Orchestration?<br/>As of my understanding UNB segment is stripped off from the actual XML before it is send to Message box.<br/>I think UNB_Segment is available in context property of the message.<br/>WHat is the data type of UNB_Segment?<br/>Can I create a string variable in Orchestration and assign <br/>strUNB = Msg1(EDI.UNB_Segment);</p> <p>Is there a default schema for UNB Segment?</p><hr class="sig">Regards, NISHIL Http://BiztalkForums.comSun, 15 Nov 2009 13:29:18 Z2009-11-22T11:16:30Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/9b5c3b24-e6c9-4613-a690-b8001d19d150http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/9b5c3b24-e6c9-4613-a690-b8001d19d150emil chinhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=emil%20chinHelp on setup AS2 on EDIFACT D97A ORDERS type<p>Hi,<br/>i was being assigned a project to implement and EDI to exchange EDIFACT 'ORDERS' message with customer. I found that BTS was able to do the EDI over AS2 on EDIFACT. However, i have read through the BTS help file and have few things need the experts to clarify:<br/><br/>1) Is BTS 2009 support EDIFACT D97A 'ORDERS' message? If yes, any way to check? If no, how to make it supported?<br/>2) Is that anyway to convert the sample EDIFACT file to XML file using BTS 2009?<br/><br/>Your valued answer is very appreciated, thks!<br/>rgds,<br/>Emil</p>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:17:33 Z2009-11-24T01:57:23Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/623a31c0-0736-4720-a5b7-57cbf777a875http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/623a31c0-0736-4720-a5b7-57cbf777a875JWood411http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=JWood411[Biztalk 2009 Beta] EDI tracking featuresHas anybody found out or blogged about any new features to the Biztalk 2009 EDI tracking abilites? Like on failed message routing is the ISA and GS information or other message properties retained with the message? Or perhaps a tracking DB for messages sent and received so that we can query interchange data for our trading partners.<br><br>Thanks In advance,<br><br>Jim WoodTue, 17 Feb 2009 21:27:46 Z2009-11-18T16:12:18Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/71aa9590-ad63-42c4-adce-b1e145fe0352http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/71aa9590-ad63-42c4-adce-b1e145fe0352Obach2uhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Obach2uBizTalk 2009 - Store Subdocument as EDI in DatabaseI am working with a client using BizTalk Server 2009 Standard edition that processes 837 claims using the 4010 Multiple schema X12. The process uses the EDIReceive pipeline to import the data. Once the data is &quot;split&quot; into the XML message, they would like to store the &quot;split&quot; message as a field in the database, but they want to store the &quot;split&quot; message in the EDI format, not the XML format. <br/>Is it possible to convert the XML message back into EDI so that the EDI formatted message can be stored in the database? <br/>Also, I should mention that we are not using maps in the orchestration. We are using .Net to persist to the database, so we need to associate the EDI message with the persisted data before inserting into the database. Does anyone have any information they could share?Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:48:45 Z2009-11-20T07:37:37Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/1dd677ba-25bb-444c-a1ab-d92b0139fa48http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/1dd677ba-25bb-444c-a1ab-d92b0139fa48Obach2uhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Obach2uBizTalk Server 2009 - Sub Document Processing Hot FixesI am working on a BizTalk Server 2009 project using the Muliptle Schema for 4010 X12 837 claims processing. I am using the EDIReceive pipeline to &quot;split&quot; the document into multiple messages and then writting the &quot;split&quot; messages in XML to a Receive port. When I look at the XML messages that are created, it appears that there is additional information in the messages. Information from other claims appears to have been associated with the claim I am trying to view. I believe that this is similar to the hot fixes for &quot;bloated XML&quot; in BizTalk Server 2006 R2 [<span style="font-family:'Calibri','sans-serif';font-size:11pt" lang=EN><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967945"><span style="color:#0000ff">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967945</span></a> ]</span>. Does anyone know if there is a hot fix for this in BizTalk Server 2009?<br/><br/> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small">When processing an 837i file that contains one (1) Transaction Set with multiple claims. We are processing an EDI file against the 837I Multiple schema to create separate messages for each claim. We are using the EDIReceive pipeline to process the file. The EDI pipeline splits the document into multiple messages and outputs the information into XML documents. The XML documents appear to have information from both claims in each document.</span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small"> </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small">Example: </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small">Claim 1 has all of the information associated with Claim 1 but also includes some of the information associated with Claim 2</span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small">Claim 2 has all of the information associated with Claim 2 but also includes some of the information associated with Claim 1</span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small"> </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small">I would expect that the message for Claim 1 would only have information associated with Claim 1 and that the message for claim 2 would only have information associated with claim 2.</span></p>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:55:41 Z2009-11-17T22:23:11Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/5a091092-712c-4bc4-9da4-010c66bf6b09http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/5a091092-712c-4bc4-9da4-010c66bf6b09Rain_MShttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Rain_MSHow do I override the UNB sender id segment in an EDIFACT message at runtime??I have a requirement to configure UNB sender segment i.e UNB5,UNB6 and UNB7 at runtime.<br/><br/>I understand that biztalk 2009 had been enhanced with the edioverridden to achieve this easily.<br/><br/>Can anyone sahre how to achive the same in BizTalk 2006 in detail?<br/><br/>Thanks a lot!Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:48:17 Z2009-11-23T01:30:39Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/e4a4c712-b5b6-4bae-8658-7c68395949f5http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/e4a4c712-b5b6-4bae-8658-7c68395949f5Moonis Tahirhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Moonis%20TahirEDIFECS hipaa 5010 version support in BizTalk 2009?<p>Do we have any EDIFECS adapter or support available for BizTalk 2009? EDIFECs for HIPAA EDI 5010 version. Please provide any guidance or link. <br/>I have sent this question to EDIFECS also but i am posting the same question here, In case some one already has exprienced working with EDIFECs with BizTalk in 4010/5010.</p><hr class="sig">Moonis Tahir MVP, MCPD, MCSD.net, MCTS BizTalk 2006/SQL 2005/SharePoint Server 2007 (Dev &amp; Config)Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:10:50 Z2009-11-16T17:21:04Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/1df6dcab-7228-4475-becd-06e5a2addfc2http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/1df6dcab-7228-4475-becd-06e5a2addfc2Idar Hhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Idar%20HHow do I override the UNB sender id segment in an EDIFACT message at runtimeHi,<br/><br/>I want to reade the EAN ident from the source XML document in BizTalk, and use it as the sender id in the UNB sebment of the EDIFACT message (ORDERS). The EAN ident is promoted, and is available in the send pipeline.<br/>I have tried to make a custom pipeline, where I read the promoted property, and as far as I can see, I must put it in the propery &quot;SenderID&quot; with the name space <a href="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2006/edi-properties">&quot;http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2006/edi-properties</a>&quot;. But when I try to promote the property, I get the exception &quot;Loading property information list by namespace failed or property not found in the list&quot;. It seems like the property schema for the namespace &quot;<a href="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2006/edi-properties">http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2006/edi-properties</a>&quot; is missing.<br/><br/>Her is the code for the custom send pipeline:<br/> <pre lang="x-c#">private IBaseMessage ExecuteInternal(IPipelineContext pContext, IBaseMessage pInMsg) { WriteToTrace(&quot;Begin ExecuteInternal()&quot;); string ReadContextPropName = &quot;EANIdent&quot;; string ReadContextPropNamespace = &quot;http://LV_EDI.PropertySchema.PropertySchema&quot;; string SetContextPropName = &quot;SenderID&quot;; string SetContextPropNamespace = <a href="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2006/edi-properties">http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2006/edi-properties</a>; try { WriteToTrace(string.Format(&quot;Reading property {0}:{1}&quot;, ReadContextPropName, ReadContextPropNamespace)); //Read from context object val = pInMsg.Context.Read(ReadContextPropName, ReadContextPropNamespace); //Write to the context if (val != null) { WriteToTrace(string.Format(&quot;Property Exists {0}:{1}&quot;, ReadContextPropName, val.ToString())); WriteToTrace(string.Format(&quot;Writing {0}:{1}:{2}&quot;, SetContextPropName, SetContextPropNamespace, val.ToString())); pInMsg.Context.Write(SetContextPropName, SetContextPropNamespace, val.ToString()); pInMsg.Context.Promote(SetContextPropName, SetContextPropNamespace, val.ToString()); } else WriteToTrace(string.Format(&quot;{0} Property Does not exist.&quot;, ReadContextPropName)); } catch (Exception ex) { // Do not fail the pipeline if we cannot archive // Just log the failure to the trace listener WriteToTrace(ex); } WriteToTrace(&quot;End ExecuteInternal()&quot;); //Clone the message and return return pInMsg; }<br/></pre> <br/>Where can I get the property schema for this name space? Or should I solve it using another method? <br/><br/><br/><br/>Thanks.Mon, 04 May 2009 10:05:36 Z2009-11-16T08:35:02Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/2ce098cd-ce08-4e57-85a4-f46f90d459cahttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/2ce098cd-ce08-4e57-85a4-f46f90d459caSandeep.Handahttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Sandeep.HandaQuestion regarding EDIFACT MAPPING in BizTalk Server 2006 R2Hi All, <div>I have a project where the data i get is EDIFACT document and one of field is having data like HDR*5+10+20*</div> <div>I want that these different data 5,10,20 should map in different destination field ..</div> <div>How can i achieve this..</div> <div><br/></div> <div>Thanks</div> <div>Sandeep</div>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:03:05 Z2009-11-20T07:42:35Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/abfccac2-cc9f-44c5-bb2a-b295f0aafd59http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/abfccac2-cc9f-44c5-bb2a-b295f0aafd59Ramprasad Dorairajhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Ramprasad%20DorairajBizTalk 2009 Mapping IssueHi,<br/>I have a specific design issue in mapping two seperate records to one in the destination schema. I have to compare the present record child element with the previous record and say if they are same then, I have to group them under one parent node in destination schema, else they will appear in seperate records. I had thought about looping here, but Im not sure on whether its possible to compare the records.<br/><br/>If any one has faced similar issues, let me know!<br/><br/>Thanks,<hr class="sig">RamThu, 12 Nov 2009 21:19:22 Z2009-11-15T00:32:43Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/8946597a-82b0-48bf-b2a0-2f179eec55f4http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/8946597a-82b0-48bf-b2a0-2f179eec55f4Sunilrchttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=SunilrcHIPPA EDI 837 Professional to a flat file Hi<br> <p>I am struggling to get my map works for an EDI 837 PROF to Flat file. The output created with all the claims first then the services lines. But I need like Claim then all the services like below. How do I do this? Is it something wrong with my loops? <br>I have looping functoid with CLAIM’s TS837Q1_2300_Loop and Patient’s TS837Q1_2300_Loop going in to the “looping” functoid and mapped to my output Claim record<br>TS837Q1_2400_Loop and TS837Q1_2400_Loop looping for services. </p> <p>CLAIM1<br>services1<br>services2<br>services3<br>CLAIM2<br>Services1<br>Services2</p><br><br>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:29:21 Z2009-11-13T22:23:58Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/20e4472f-2e9c-401a-9262-b8c4bf68aefahttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/20e4472f-2e9c-401a-9262-b8c4bf68aefaVidhyaVijayaKumarhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=VidhyaVijayaKumarMigrating 2002 EDI Schema in 2006 R2<span style="font-size:x-small">Hello,<br/><br/>Is there any way to convert 2002 XDR Schema (which of &quot;LOGMES&quot; EDI Message type) in 2006 R2. <br/>With the help of VS.net, I've got the Schema but it is not of EDI Type.<br/><br/>Then I tried the below tool. But it looks for only &quot;.xsd&quot; and not &quot;.xml&quot;<br/>C:\Program Files\Microsoft BizTalk Server 2006\SDK\Utilities\MicrosoftEDI\BTS06EdiSchemaMigrator.exe<br/></span> <p><span style="font-size:x-small;font-family:Verdana">I tried to give my converted xsd (thru VS.Net) as input to BTS06EdiSchemaMigrator.exe<br/>&quot;<br/><span style="color:#ff00ff">Unable to migrate schema C:\LORIS\LoRIS_SourceCode\From Dev machine\BizTalk\SourceCode\Sygma\Code\Biztalk2002\DocSpecs\Loris\EDI_LOGMES_Schema.xsd.  Error returned: 'XmlSchemaSet' can load only W3C XML Schemas.</span><br/>&quot;<br/><br/>Can you pls suggest ways to proceed.<br/></span></p>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:14:37 Z2009-11-17T03:25:19Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/74b29a99-b751-4840-b65b-05ce88a36144http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/74b29a99-b751-4840-b65b-05ce88a36144callvishnuhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=callvishnuMigration of EDI Application from BizTalk Server 2006 R2 to 2009Hi, <br/><br/>We need to migrate our application from 2006 R2 to 2009. We are currently using X12 standard of 00401 version. We use around 10 diffirent messages.<br/>Have someone been involved in such kind of activity. If yes then please :<br/>1-Any suggestion<br/>2-Estimated time<br/>3-What artifacts we can migrate and what we can not. as we also have some custom component such as custom disassembler and custom exception component.<br/><br/>Regards<br/>Vishnu<hr class="sig">VishnuTue, 10 Nov 2009 17:17:05 Z2009-11-16T11:50:43Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/6bf3f528-391e-4a93-8b8c-6eca3d0e35a4http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/6bf3f528-391e-4a93-8b8c-6eca3d0e35a4zelishWBhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=zelishWBAS2 Synchronous MDN with OrchestrationHi All,<br/> <br/> I'm working on Biztalk server as2. I want to receive as2 message from my partner and send synchronous mdn to my partner. I know i need to use a two-way receive port and party configuration. Also i know how i can configure party and port. <br/> <br/> But i want to use orchestration. I create a two-way receive port, a receive shape and a send shape. But what should be mdn send shape's message type?<br/> <br/> Any idea?<br/> <br/> Thanks,<br/> <br/> ZelihaThu, 12 Nov 2009 17:03:48 Z2009-11-13T00:05:09Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/428a88d6-8185-48b9-9d66-9d1bef588191http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/428a88d6-8185-48b9-9d66-9d1bef588191Prakash CMShttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Prakash%20CMSGetting error: It could not be classified as an X12 or Edifact message<p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'Arial','sans-serif';color:black;font-size:10pt">Tag: Configure dynamic output file name from multiple source/input file name.<br/><br/>I am getting target namespace error while processing through party.</span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'Arial','sans-serif';color:black;font-size:10pt"> </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'Arial','sans-serif';color:black;font-size:10pt">I have modified X12 base template of X12_00401_210 and added Root node DS_RHW_210. </span><span style="font-family:'Arial','sans-serif';color:black;font-size:10pt">Schema target namespace given as <a href="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006Custom"><span style="color:#0000ff">http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006Custom</span></a></span><span style="font-family:'Arial','sans-serif';font-size:10pt"> and selected “<span style="color:black">DS_RHW_210” as Root node.</span></span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'Arial','sans-serif';color:black;font-size:10pt"> </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'Arial','sans-serif';color:black;font-size:10pt">Map works perfectly, I have created an Orchestration to transform through mapping, created send port as edisend which is assigned to a party. </span><span style="font-family:'Arial','sans-serif';color:black;font-size:10pt">Messages were passing through Orchestration and getting error as </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'Arial','sans-serif';color:black;font-size:10pt"><br/>Error 1:<br/> <br/></span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"> </p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'MS Shell Dlg','sans-serif';font-size:8.5pt">&quot;A message sent to adapter &quot;FILE&quot; on send port &quot;SendPortEDI&quot; with URI &quot;E:\Project Files\BIZTALK\210-RESTORATION HARDWARE\FinalTest\EDIOut\%MessageID%.txt&quot; is suspended. </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'MS Shell Dlg','sans-serif';font-size:8.5pt"> Error details: There was a failure executing the send pipeline: &quot;Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.DefaultPipelines.EdiSend, Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.EdiPipelines, Version=3.0.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35&quot; Source: &quot;EDI assembler&quot; Send Port: &quot;SendPortEDI&quot; URI: &quot;E:\Project Files\BIZTALK\210-RESTORATION HARDWARE\FinalTest\EDIOut\%MessageID%.txt&quot; Reason: A message was encountered with root element name of DS_RHW_210. It could not be classified as an X12 or Edifact message. The root namespace was <a href="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006Custom"><span style="color:#0000ff">http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006Custom</span></a>  </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'MS Shell Dlg','sans-serif';font-size:8.5pt"> MessageId:  {6F2D1E93-F02C-4DC7-8782-962BD8B96854}</span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'MS Shell Dlg','sans-serif';font-size:8.5pt"> InstanceID: {730709F9-7C99-41E0-99BC-04DF76141C1D}&quot;</span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'MS Shell Dlg','sans-serif';font-size:8.5pt"> </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:'MS Shell Dlg','sans-serif';font-size:8.5pt">Error 2: <br/><br/>&quot;There was a failure executing the send pipeline: &quot;Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.DefaultPipelines.EdiSend, Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.EdiPipelines, Version=3.0.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35&quot; Source: &quot;EDI assembler&quot; Send Port: &quot;SendPortEDI&quot; URI: &quot;E:\Project Files\BIZTALK\210-RESTORATION HARDWARE\FinalTest\EDIOut\%MessageID%.txt&quot; Reason: A message was encountered with root element name of DS_RHW_210. It could not be classified as an X12 or Edifact message. The root namespace was <a href="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006Custom"><span style="color:#0000ff">http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006Custom</span></a>&quot;<br/><br/>Thanks.</span></p>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:15:45 Z2009-11-17T03:28:54Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/c9776508-66d0-4317-b8bf-46785589c16fhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/c9776508-66d0-4317-b8bf-46785589c16fParahThttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=ParahTEDI Reporting again<p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size:small"><span style="font-family:Calibri">I posted a question about EDI reporting before and received some suggestions.<span style="">  </span>I have been working on this for a while now and I can’t seem to come up with a solution to my problem.</span></span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small"> </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small">I need the ability to track the following from out bound invoices (810), invoice number (</span><span style="font-family:'Courier New';font-size:10pt">BIG02</span><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small">), invoice date (</span><span style="font-family:'Courier New';font-size:10pt">BIG01</span><span style="font-size:small"><span style="font-family:Calibri">) and acknowledgement status (997).<span style="">  </span>I have tried promoting properties (distinguished and with property schemas) with no success.<span style="">  </span>When I reached the conclusion that the EDI pipeline on my send port will not promote properties I decided to try and create a custom pipeline component to promote my properties.<span style="">  </span>This failed as my custom pipeline needs to use the EDI assembler which I found out does not promote any of the message context properties associated with an EDI message (ISA segment, GS Segment, etc..) and does not give me a message that I could use XPATH queries to get my required values.</span></span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small"> </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size:small"><span style="font-family:Calibri">I need similar tracking for outbound 850 and 860’s and I can get everything I need because the EDI dis-assembler I use in my custom outbound pipeline promotes all the EDI message context properties and allows me to do XPATH queries. </span></span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small"> </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size:small"><span style="font-family:Calibri">If anyone has a possible solution or something to try I would appreciate it greatly.<span style="">  </span>But for now I have to believe that the above EDI invoice tracking scenario is impossible in BizTalk 2006 R2.</span></span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small"> </span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size:small"><span style="font-family:Calibri">Thanks</span></span></p>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:29:01 Z2009-11-12T16:37:12Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/125e1beb-9afd-41bd-a883-092de0fc179fhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/125e1beb-9afd-41bd-a883-092de0fc179fRSubhahttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=RSubhaCreate multiple ST_SE segments within one ISA_IEA envelope using BizTalk 2009Hi,<br/>I am using BizTalk server 2009 for 837 outbound file generation. My 837 file should have one ISA_IEA segments in a file and the claims submitted by each provider should be created within each ST_SE segment. From the SQL DB I am receiving the claims information for each provider and trying to append them in a single file after the HIPAA assembler. The HIPAA assembler is creating ISA_IEA for each ST_SE and appending it in the file. How can I create multiple ST_SE segments within a single ISA_IEA segment.Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:08:39 Z2009-11-13T07:48:20Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/b2765f46-b885-49cc-9f1b-60f85004a240http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/b2765f46-b885-49cc-9f1b-60f85004a240Jeff Ericksonhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Jeff%20EricksonHIPAA EDI Document Splitting - 837D<p align=left><font face=Arial size=2>Hey everybody,</font></p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>We are encountering a problem with BizTalk Server 2006 R2 with regards to document splitting in the 837D EDI schema.  In our current environment, we are running BizTalk Server 2006 and are attempting to move to BizTalk Server 2006 R2 for a new project we have underway.</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>The problem we are seeing is in how the EDI Engine in R2 is splitting up our EDI 837D files when they are picked up by BizTalk through a Receive Location that utilizes the EdiReceive Pipeline.  In 2006, once an 837D EDI file was received, the HIPAA Accelerator would split the file into messages where each Claim (2300 Loop) was its own Message.  I looked at the 837D schema (multiple) that came with 2006, and it appears this document splitting was based on the attribute subdocument_creation_break=&quot;yes&quot; being speficied in the 2300 Loop XML node.</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>The 837D multiple schema that came with R2 also has subdocument_creation_break=&quot;yes&quot; specified at the 2300 Loop, but it generates drastically different results than what we are seeing in 2006.  In 2006, the 837D file, once translated to XML and split, would give us one Message per Claim where the information in the XML Message included only that information that pertained to the Claim.  This would include information from the ISA segment, GS segment, ST segment, 2000A Loop, 2000B Loop, 2300 Loop, etc., all the way down to the most granular level of detail that pertained to the Claim, but would not include any information that did not pertain to the Claim.</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>Now, in R2, if this document splitting attribute is specified in the 2300 Loop, in each Message we still get only that information from the 2300 Loop on down that pertains to the Claim.  However, we get all of the information from the higher levels in every Message generated by the EDI Engine.  For example, if we have an 837D EDI file that has 3 Claims in it (3 2300 Loops), and each 2300 Loop has its own 2000B Loop as a parent (3 2000B Loops), each Message generated by the EDI Engine will contain only one 2300 Loop, but it was also contain all 3 2000B Loops.  We have tried moving the attribute subdocument_creation_break=&quot;yes&quot; to other higher levels in the 837D schema, but that can result in more than one 2300 Loop being included in each Message.</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>Basically, I'm trying to duplicate the processing output we are seeing in 2006, but I can't make it work in R2.  We either get lots of unnecessary data in each Message, or we get multiple 2300 Loops in each Message.</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>Have any of you seen or experienced this same problem, and can help us achieve the desired result?  Even if it is not possible in R2, that would be good to know.  Every post I've read about the subdocument_creation_break=&quot;yes&quot; attribute makes it sound like it works great, but it is not giving us the results we are looking for.</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>Thank you.</p>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:33:05 Z2009-11-12T11:24:08Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/8073c57e-07d5-4f22-a5d9-946035c0eea6http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/8073c57e-07d5-4f22-a5d9-946035c0eea6Peter Ungemachhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Peter%20UngemachAS2 Messages bigger than 1 MB makes a MIC not verified failureHi all,<br/><br/>if we receive messages bigger than 1 MB via AS2, the sender get the error <span style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:x-small">&quot;MIC not verified&quot;</span><br/><br/> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family:'Tahoma','sans-serif';font-size:10pt" lang=EN-US>(Though UPXI has sent it successfully there have been some problems with regards its message integrity checking.</span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style="margin:0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family:'Tahoma','sans-serif';font-size:10pt" lang=EN-US> </span></p> <span style="font-family:'Tahoma','sans-serif';font-size:10pt" lang=EN-US>Upon investigation the message is experiencing a &quot;MIC not verified&quot; issue. )<br/><br/>The message itself is correctly processed on our side, but the sender side get everytime an error message.<br/><br/>Now I am not sure if it is a BizTalk problem while generating the MDNs for those messages or if it is a problem on the sender side.<br/>Because this side says <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb226414(BTS.20).aspx">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb226414(BTS.20).aspx</a> messages up to 96 MB could be processed.<br/><br/>Kind regards<br/>Peter<br/><br/></span>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:58:22 Z2009-11-12T09:31:50Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/dd0ed604-3c86-498f-976f-caf1f7e622fehttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/dd0ed604-3c86-498f-976f-caf1f7e622feHiseliushttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=HiseliusBizTalk 2009 support for EDIFACT messages ORDERS S93A and INSDES D96A<p>Is there any way to get support for these EDIFACT message types in BizTalk?<br/>I know there is support for this if I by the &quot;Covast EDI Accelerator&quot;. But that seems to be overkill in my case.<br/><br/>Thanks,<br/><br/>/ola</p>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:52:50 Z2009-11-11T20:54:19Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/13f688f2-d0ff-417f-8188-96705b80cb66http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/13f688f2-d0ff-417f-8188-96705b80cb66KWeberhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=KWeberFlat File DebatchingHi <br/><br/>I have to debatch a flat File with the following structure <br/><br/>UN1<br/>.<br/>.<br/>.<br/>UN1<br/>.<br/>.<br/>.<br/>etc.<br/><br/>I would like to do the devbatching with a pipeline.<br/><br/>My Schema has a root node and a record with an element inside<br/><br/>root<br/>    record<br/>            element (where the data is inside)<br/><br/>I cannot use a fully strutured schema because the the incoming flatfile have a different structure. The only characterisitca they have in common is the header record UN1.<br/><br/>I tired a lot but I did not succeed. How do I have to configure the child order and the child order delimiter type for this flat file?<br/><br/>Thanks for your help <br/><hr class="sig">Klaus WeberWed, 04 Nov 2009 22:28:39 Z2009-11-12T02:41:59Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/c7b6ef04-b03b-4863-a41e-b8898dcef1f9http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/c7b6ef04-b03b-4863-a41e-b8898dcef1f9RSubhahttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=RSubhaUse of "Batches" Option in EDI properties of Party in BTS 2009Hi,<br/><br/>In the EDI properties of the Party, there is one option called &quot;Batches&quot;. Please explain the use of this. In the Batches Option we can create new batch and we have to give the number of &quot;Groups&quot; and &quot;Interchanges&quot;. What is the use of these settings. Will this helps to create more than one group in the EDI file. If so how will be create the groups?Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:22:06 Z2009-11-13T04:49:37Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/7ef74b7f-e597-4030-806a-cb85d220eb98http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/7ef74b7f-e597-4030-806a-cb85d220eb98PieterVdhhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=PieterVdhBizTalk - EDI Batching per interchangeHello all, <div><br/></div> <div>I'm having a problem with the EDI batching in BizTalk 2009 (and BizTalk 2006 R2 for that matter).</div> <div><br/></div> <div><strong>My situation is the following:</strong></div> <div>I have one specific FF message which I map into one or more (EDIFACT) DESADV messages and always one (EDIFACT) IFCSUM message.</div> <div>These messages need to be combined into one and the same EDI interchange, so I'm using the Batching orchestration built-in into BizTalk 2009.</div> <div>As a result I need to get one EDIFACT interchange with the IFCSUM always as the last within the interchange.</div> <div><br/></div> <div><strong>My solution so far:</strong></div> <div>I have one orchestration which splits (and maps) the incoming FF into one or more DESADV messages and into one IFCSUM message.</div> <div>These are put on the message box and picked up by a send port to the FILE system (EDISend pipeline).</div> <div>From there, they are picked up again by a FILE receive location  (EDIReceive) *</div> <div><br/></div> <div>* Reason for this is that apparently it is impossible to call the EDI send/receive pipelines from within an orchestration?</div> <div>I need to do this, because the batching orchestration only batches with complete EDI messages (meaning that they need to have UNH for example filled in).</div> <div><br/></div> <div>From there, I use another orchestration that activates on the receive of a DESADV and will then listen for more DESADV messages until a timer of 15 seconds is ended as of which it then listens for the IFCSUM.</div> <div>After each receive of a message that validates these rules, I send it to the Batching orchestration (which is setup in my Party setup).</div> <div>Then an external release trigger message is sent to complete the interchange and send it out to a send port.</div> <div><br/></div> <div><strong><br/></strong></div> <div><strong>My questions</strong>:</div> <div> 1) Is there any way to call the EDI Send/Receive pipeline from within my orchestration? </div> <div>     I have searched A LOT and found nothing useful.</div> <div> 2) Now, when 2 FF messages are received within a short time frame (few seconds), these are mixed up between the interchanges and completely invalidates my output.</div> <div>     Is there any way to solve this? (also see <span style="background-color:#ffffff"><a href="http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/ea6bb531-d095-47d5-a51b-b4c892553eec/">http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/ea6bb531-d095-47d5-a51b-b4c892553eec/</a> for the same issue)</span></div> <div>3) Any pointers as to where I can improve the solution? I don't feel comfortable with the 15 second timer for example... </div> <div><br/></div> <div><br/></div> <div>All help is really appreciated!</div> <div><br/></div> <div>Kind regards,</div> <div>Pieter</div> <div><br/></div>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:56:08 Z2009-11-11T09:37:25Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/0386b908-e5e3-478a-ab46-b2a547c2e0e3http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/0386b908-e5e3-478a-ab46-b2a547c2e0e3SteveDWhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=SteveDW997 GS08 Version/Release/Industry Identifier Code<p align=left><font size=2>One of our business partners is taking issue with the 997 GS08 element (Data Element 480 Version/Release/Industry Identifier Code) we are providing in response to receipt of 837 files. It appears that BizTalk 2006 R2 is using the GS08 from the inbound transaction set to build the 997 acknowledgement GS08.  Our business partner is rejecting the 997 because it is their understanding that the 997 GS08 should only contain the &quot;004010&quot; version identifier, and not the transaction set specific version identifier of the 837 (e.g. &quot;<font size=2>004010X098A1&quot;).  As support for their assertion, they are pointing to the <font size=2>004010 ASC X12 Standard Implementation Guide, <font size=2>Data Element 480 Version/Release/Industry Identifier Code section, where it is stated that &quot;</font></font></font>element GS08 is to be used for the transaction being used (sent).&quot;  In this case the 997. Since there isn't an Implementation Guide for this transaction, 004010 is the version identifier.</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>Question: Is the Version/Release/Industry Identifier Code of the source file GS08 acceptable in the corresponding 997 acknowledgment file GS08? In other words, is the 004010X098A1 from an inbound 837P valid in the GS08 of the <span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial">acknowledging </span>997 file?</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>If no, how can we set the outbound 997 GS08 differently than the inbound transaction set (e.g. 837)?</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>If yes, where can we find documentation to support this assertion?</p></font>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:54:42 Z2009-11-06T19:45:10Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/8c3ea571-6281-4c13-9b3f-72b2bd2c52fbhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/8c3ea571-6281-4c13-9b3f-72b2bd2c52fbSarala Sathishhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Sarala%20SathishBizTalk Server 2009 HIPAA EDI Document Splitting - Similar to KB 967945Hi,<br/> <br/> 837 Document splitting issue at the claim level still exists in Biztalk server 2009.<br/> This issue was addressed by KB 967945 in Biztalk server R2.<br/> Can anybody from MSFT throw some light ?<br/> <br/> Regards<br/> Sarala <br/>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:40:50 Z2009-11-05T16:56:26Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/0744ac8a-5acc-488f-809f-1bd0879c664fhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/0744ac8a-5acc-488f-809f-1bd0879c664fRamprasad Dorairajhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Ramprasad%20DorairajBizTalk Server 2009 -HIPAA configuring a party issuesHi,<br/>I have to send a HIPAA 837 file as an output of my process. Since it needs to have the party details like ISA and GS segments, i have to configure the party for the same. Since this is a process where i would be sending a EDI file do i need to configur party as a Interchange Sender?<br/><br/>If so, the various values in ISA say ISA02 and ISA04- I could not specify it while configuring the party, even though their values are just spaces...What am i supposed to do?<br/><br/>Other Interchange items like ISA09,ISA10,ISA11 to ISA16 ...I'm not able to see these properties , so I could not configure them. <br/><br/>For the functional identifier like GS, I have to configure the values from GS01 to GS08...Again, I'm not able to see those properties How can I configure them?<br/><br/>Your help is appreciated!<br/><br/>Thanks,<br/><hr class="sig">RamWed, 04 Nov 2009 01:08:32 Z2009-11-05T04:39:39Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/7a6e2b5e-45a3-4c10-826e-b63794abaa28http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/7a6e2b5e-45a3-4c10-826e-b63794abaa28elly CChttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=elly%20CCReceive error message while deal with AS2 MDNHi All<br/>Error occured while BizTalk Server deal with the MDN message from one partner. <br/>Error description is below:<br/>The outbound message of the component &quot;Microsoft.BizTalk.EdiInt.PipelineComponents&quot; in receive pipeline &quot;Microsoft.BizTalk.EdiInt.DefaultPipelines.AS2Receive, Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.EdiIntPipelines&quot; is suspended.<br/>AS2 message validation failed. Please make sure the certificate is not overdued or revoked.<br/><br/>I dont choose Check Certification Revocation List  while configuring general AS2 properties.<br/><br/>BizTalk Server can process messages from other partners successfully. <br/>It also can process the AS2(except MDN) messages successfully received from this partner.<br/>This error only occured while receive MDN from this partner.<br/><br/>Can anyone advise the reason for this question?<br/><br/><br/>Elly CCWed, 02 Sep 2009 12:44:27 Z2009-11-04T09:57:37Zhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/80bb90be-8da0-4260-a39c-32cf1facb70dhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkediandas2/thread/80bb90be-8da0-4260-a39c-32cf1facb70dToby Worthhttp://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=Toby%20WorthX12 00401 867 Receiving EDI Document fails with Invalid character in data element<p align=left><font face="Times New Roman">Hello,</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font> </p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">I am use X12 4010 867 (BizTalk Server 2006 R2) to send a report.<span>  </span></font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font> </p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">I have the All Parties to “Allow Leading and Trailing Zeroes and Spaces”.</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font> </p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">I customized the X12_00401_867<span>  </span>ITA07 field to be X12_R (SimpleType).</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font> </p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">When generating the XML of the 867 the ITA07 is a ####0.00 string value.<span>  </span></font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font> </p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">The message is sent thru the Send Port successfully, but I then read back in the EDI file ( for batching ) and it fails with below.</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font> </p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Event Type:<span> </span>Error</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Event Source:<span>     </span>BizTalk Server 2006 EDI</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Event Category:<span>   </span>None</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Event ID:<span>   </span>8116</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Date:<span>       </span>6/3/2008</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Time:<span>       </span>3:30:32 PM</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">User:<span>       </span>N/A</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Description:</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">The batch element is being suspended as it failed validation. The error is : Stopping after the first error !!</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Error: 1 (Field level error)</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"><span>      </span>SegmentID: ITA</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"><span>      </span>Position in TS: 16</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"><span>      </span>Data Element ID: ITA07</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"><span>      </span>Position in Segment: 7</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"><span>      </span>Data Value: 0.40</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"><span>      </span>6: Invalid character in data element</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font> </p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">If I remove the trailing zero in this field it successfully reads the EDI file.</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font> </p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">This there any way to change this behavior?</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font> </p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"></font> </p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Thank,</font></p> <p class=MsoPlainText style="margin:0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Toby </font></p>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:58:53 Z2009-11-03T21:23:19Z