Locked AlwaysOn on Virtual m/c

  • Dienstag, 7. Februar 2012 16:32
     
     

    I wanted to understand the difference in setting up the Always on high availability feature on Physical infrastructure Vs Virtual environment ( VMWare ESX).

Alle Antworten

  • Montag, 13. Februar 2012 06:48
     
     
    I am not so sure what you are aiming at... The setup is pretty much the same....
  • Montag, 13. Februar 2012 06:52
     
     

    I have used Hyper-V machine to setup AlwaysOn. I created 5 machines: 1 DC, 4 Nodes.

    It was a smooth process. What is the error you are facing?


    Balmukund Lakhani | Please mark solved if I've answered your question, vote for it as helpful to help other user's find a solution quicker
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    My Blog | Team Blog | @Twitter

  • Dienstag, 14. Februar 2012 08:06
     
     

    Hi Satish,

    from an Always On point of view the setup is exactly the same.

    Regards

    Régis

  • Dienstag, 14. Februar 2012 19:18
     
     Vorgeschlagene Antwort
    There is no diff  wrt to AlwaysOn. however, there are some limitations about the # of CPUs that the SQL can recongize between physical and virtual servers.
    • Als Antwort vorgeschlagen Goden Yao[MSFT] Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2012 20:05
    •  
  • Mittwoch, 14. März 2012 00:37
     
     

    Here's E2E video tutorial I created to evaluate W2008R2 + SQL denali CTP1

    Prepare one box Virtual lab to evaluate SQL Server Denali Always-ON Features

    For latest on Windows server 8 Hyper-V and SQL 2012 RTM test lab see latest series on www.sqlfeatures.com

    Windows Server 8 Hyper-V Lab boot from VHD


    Prakash Heda | Sr Infrastructure DBA | Advent Software | http://www.sqlfeatures.com